Examinations – Student performance evaluation and grading

 

In the MSc Program Study Regulation, article 7, students can find all information relevant to teaching and examinations. The same information is summarized in the present tab.

Teaching is organized in two academic semesters, Winter and Spring, each extending to 13 weeks of lectures followed by 2 weeks of examinations (examination period of January for course modules taught in the Winter semester and examination period of June for course modules taught in the Spring semester). Furthermore, in the examination period of September, students may re-sit in any course module exam, either of the Winter or of the Spring semester.

Students enroll in a number of modules in the beginning of each new academic semester. Attendance of classes for these modules is mandatory, as is the participation in all other educational activities of the program as detailed in the Curriculum and the Syllabus. In particular, it is important that students participate in all research-related events organized by the MSc program, the respective Research Labs or the Department.

Classes are taught according to the announced schedule. Delays beyond 15 minutes are considered as missed class; the student, however, may still attend the class. Students who have missed more than two (2) of the scheduled classes, automatically fail the module and are not allowed to participate either in the regular exam period or the September exam period. Student attendance is recorded by each class instructor who evaluate participation and progress continuously.

If a class is cancelled for any reason, it is rescheduled by the class instructor who announces the new date and time in the website. Students have to closely follow the MSc program website, to keep updated on announcements, news and events.

 

Student progress and performance may be assessed by written or oral exams, by projects and presentation, by tests and quizzes or in any other way detailed in the course module EVALUATION METHOD tab, in the page of each course module, along with the corresponding grade breakdown. Assessment may take place in midterm, at the end of the term, at both time points or continuously, throughout the semester.

Evaluation details per course module are given in the following table:

Module Code Module Title Examination details per module
A.01 Research Methodology – Scientific Writing

The final grade is composed of 3 parts:

1.sample regular paper or short review paper write-up (student is free to select paper subject; supervisor consent is required; the subject is usually related to the student’s research project topic) x 60%

2.the presentation of this paper in class x 20%

3.the review of the paper written by a classmate x 20%

Grading criteria for (a):

·Paper structure

·Understanding and critical assessment of existing research

·Sound documentation of and argumentation on the proposed research results

·Correct formatting and referencing

Grading criteria for (b):

· Presentation structure

· Content formatting

· Fluency in presentation and ability to answer questions on it

Grading criteria for (c):

·Review structure

·Control points as in (a) and (b) above, used as review criteria,

·Expression, language and style of the review

A.02 Scientific Computing and Mathematical Modeling

Student evaluation comes from

1.Class participation and contribution in the discussions held in class and online x 20%

2.Average Grade of Homework Assignments (best 4 out of the total of 5 grades obtained) x 40%

3.Final written exam on computer x 40%

A.03 Supervised Research I

The results of supervised research achieved in the 1st semester of study are evaluated on the basis of Technical Report I. This is written by the student, turned in in paper and in electronic form by the end of the semester, orally presented to the evaluation committee within the examination period, graded by the supervising committee and filled by the secretariat.

The supervising committee may

(i) Accept Technical Report I as it is.

(ii) Return Technical Report I to the student along with written comments for improvement. In that case, the student advances to the 2nd semester and continues his/her research, with the obligation to submit and present the improved Technical Report I along with Technical Report II by the end of the 2nd semester of study.

(iii) Reject Technical Report I. In that case, the student fails in MRES.A.03 and has to repeat it.

An accepted Technical Report I is graded by the examination committee on the basis of the set of defined evaluation criteria and grade breakdown, as detailed in the MSc Program Study Regulation. The final grade is the average of the grades given individually by each committee member. The committee submits the signed Technical Report I evaluation form to the Secretariat.

The Technical Report I evaluation form along with the detailed criteria and grade breakdown per criterion can be found in the “BIBLIOGRAPHY” tab of the present module.

B.01 Science, Technology, Society: From History to Policy

·Before each lecture, students are required to read a chosen article and answer specific questions that have been posed by the instructor beforehand. Each student thus prepares and delivers a 2-page essay before each lecture. The instructor reads the students’ essays before the lecture and uses them to organize a discussion.

·The final grade is the average of the grades given to these weekly short essays.

B.03 Supervised Research II

The results of supervised research achieved in the 2nd semester of study are evaluated on the basis of Technical Report II. This is written by the student, turned in in paper and in electronic form by the end of the semester, orally presented to the supervising committee within the examination period, graded by the supervising committee and filled by the secretariat.

The supervising committee may

(i) Accept Technical Report II as it is.

(ii) Return Technical Report II to the student along with written comments for improvement. In that case, the student advances to the 3rd semester and continues his/her research to prepare the MSc Thesis, with the obligation to submit and present the improved Technical Report II along with the MSc Thesis by the end of the 3rd semester of study.

(iii) Reject Technical Report II. In that case, the student fails in MRES.B.03 and has to repeat it.

An accepted Technical Report II is graded by the examination committee on the basis of the set of defined evaluation criteria and grade breakdown, as detailed in the MSc Program Study Regulation. The final grade is the average of the grades given individually by each committee member. The committee submits the signed Technical Report II evaluation form to the Secretariat.

The Technical Report II evaluation form along with the detailed criteria and grade breakdown per criterion can be found in the “BIBLIOGRAPHY” tab of the present module.

C.01 MSc Thesis

MSc thesis is turned in and orally defended by the student to the respective examination committee. The procedure is held in public.

The examination committee may

(i) accept the MSc thesis as it is,

(ii) return the thesis to the student along with comments for improvement and set a new deadline for defense, or

(iii) reject the thesis.

An accepted MSc thesis is graded by the examination committee on the basis of the set of defined evaluation criteria and grade breakdown, as detailed in the MSc Program Study Regulation. The final grade is the average of the grades given individually by each committee member. After the committee files the MSc thesis grading form with the Secretariat, the student has to upload the thesis in full text in the UNIWA repository POLYNOE, under the MSc program partition, for the grade to become final.

The MSc thesis evaluation form along with the detailed criteria and grade breakdown per criterion can be found in the “BIBLIOGRAPHY” tab of the present module.

C.02 Publication of research results Binary (YES/NO), submitted to the MSc Secretariat by the supervisor along with a copy of the publication or the acceptance letter.
B.02.01 Selected Topics in image Processing and Computer Vision

Student evaluation comes from

1.Homework Assignments (50% of the final grade): There will be two programming assignments during the course. The first assignment is worth 15% while the other assignment is worth 35%.

2.Course Project (50% of the final grade): You will work either individually or in pairs, in order to carry out a given project.

B.02.02 Multifunctional materials and Wearable Devices

Student evaluation comes from

·Mini group project x 30%

·Final written exam x 70%

B.02.03 Multilayer structures in Organic Optoelectronic Devices

Student evaluation comes from

·Mini group project x 40%

·Final written exam x 60%

B.02.04 Fiber Bragg Gratings in optical fiber communications and sensing applications

Student evaluation comes from

·Lab project x 30%

·Final written exam x 70%

B.02.05 Advanced topics in Antennas and 5G Communications

Student evaluation comes from:

1.Average Grade of Homework Assignments (best 3 out of the total of 4 grades obtained) x 20%

2.Mini group project x 50%

3.Final written exam x 30%

B.02.06 Special Control Schemes in Wireless Sensor Networks

Student evaluation comes from:

·Average Grade of Homework Assignments: 20% of final grade

·Final written examination: 80% of final grade

B.02.07 Selected topics in Small Hydroelectric Power Plants

Student evaluation comes from

1.Class participation, mini-tests and contribution in the discussions held in class and online x 10%

2.Grade of Homework Assignment x 40%

3.Final written exam x 50%

B.02.08 E-learning: Mining, Analytics and Visualization of Educational Data

Student evaluation comes from

· An EDM / LA project (50% of the final grade) – individual or teamwork

· A visualization project (50% of the final grade) – individual or teamwork

Grading is in the 0.0 – 10.0 scale. Grades are given with accuracy of one decimal digit. Passing grade is 5.0 for all modules. For graduation, however, a GPA of 6.0 or above is required. GPA is computed as the average of the final grades obtained by the student in each course module, weighted by the corresponding ECTS units. GPA is calculated with accuracy of two decimal digits. GPA is accompanied by performance ranking as follows:

8.50 – 10.00: Excellent

6.50 – 8.49: Very Good

6.00 – 6.49: Good

5.00 – 5.99: Unsatisfactory

0.00 – 4.99: Fail

In the case of an ‘Unsatisfactory’ or a ‘Fail’ result (GPA less than 6.00), the Department does not confer the MSc degree and title. Instead, the student receives a Certificate of Attendance stating all successfully completed modules or other educational activities, along with their grades and ECTS units.

Instructors file examination results and grades with the Secretariat within two (2) weeks after the end of the corresponding examination period. They also file with the Secretariat all documentation for the grade given, such as written exam sheets, technical reports, project reports, presentations, etc. All these are kept in record by the Secretariat.

The MSc thesis is written and submitted by the student under the research area and research title defined in the respective call. In the case that a modification of the research title (within the same research area) is deemed necessary, so that the new title describes more accurately the research work, an application along with a brief justification has to be filed with the Secretariat by the supervisor. Applications can be filed at any time before the MSc thesis examination procedure. They are forwarded to the Assembly of the Department for consent and become effective immediately afterwards.

MSc thesis is undertaken and carried out strictly on an individual basis. The MSc thesis text should extend to up to 20,000 words approximately. In case of theses that include the development of novel audiovisual or of other digital material or software application, the thesis text can be reduced to 10,000 words approximately. The thesis preparation must follow the plan, stages and schedule agreed between the student and the supervisor.

MSc theses are submitted for examination within the deadline announced by the Secretariat, at the end of each academic semester. Thesis preparation extensions are granted for exceptional reasons such as health issues. Thesis preparation extensions are granted by the CC for whole academic semesters only, after a written justified and documented application of the student.

MSc theses are submitted for examination along with a form signed by the supervisor who states that the thesis is completed and ready for evaluation. The thesis is submitted in digital form, along with any supplemental digital material. A single printed and bound copy is given to the Secretariat for MSc records, after examination, acceptance and grading of the thesis. Thesis text formatting should strictly follow the instructions and template of the MSc program, which is decided by the CC and made available online in the program website. The text should be preceded by an abstract of 300-400 words approximately, along with a set of 4-6 keywords.

An MSc thesis is examined by the tripartite examination committee that includes the supervisor. The student presents and orally defends the thesis to the committee. The procedure is held in public and the date and place are announced in time by the Secretariat. The committee may (i) accept the MSc thesis as it is, (ii) return the thesis to the student along with comments for improvement and set a new deadline for defense, or (iii) reject the thesis.

  1. In the first case, the thesis is graded by the examination committee on the basis of the set of defined evaluation criteria and grade breakdown, as detailed in Appendix II of this Regulation. The final grade is the average of the grades given individually by each committee member. After the committee files the MSc thesis grading form with the Secretariat, the student has to upload the thesis in full text in the UNIWA repository POLYNOE, under the MSc program partition, for the grade to become final.
  2. In the second case, the whole procedure is repeated for the defense and acceptance of the improved thesis version.
  3. In the third case, the Department does not confer the Master of Science degree and title. Instead, the student receives a Certificate of Attendance stating all successfully completed modules or other educational activities, along with their grades and ECTS units.

Accepted and graded MSc theses must be uploaded in full text in the digital repository of UNIWA Library POLYNOE. After the examination committee files the MSc thesis grading form with the Secretariat, the student has to upload the thesis in full text in POLYNOE, under the MSc program partition, for the grade to take effect.

Students should clearly and meticulously cite any external sources of material(s) used in the text of the MSc thesis or in any other text(s) students submit during their studies to fulfill the requirements of the MSc program. They also take special care to place quoted text in quotation marks, so as to differentiate it from their own original text. Quoted text coming from external sources or text similar to already published text(s) of the same or other author(s) should not exceed 20% of the total thesis text, excluding bibliographic references and cover pages. Observation of the above limit is checked by the supervisor on the final thesis text, prior to submission of the text for examination, using the UNIWA-endorsed software tool (Turnitin® or other). In the cases of Technical Reports I and II and of the MSc thesis, the resulting percentage of similarity is forwarded by the supervisor to the other two members of the examination committee.

Plagiarism is considered a grave academic offense. The term covers all cases of

  • appropriation or use of the work(s) or part of work(s) of others, either published or not, without the due reference,
  • re-use of previous work(s) or parts of work(s) by the same author that have already been submitted and evaluated within a different framework, without clearly stating so,
  • quotation of any documentation material without the due reference to its source.

In the unfortunate case that a student commits any of the above academic offenses and after a documented proposition by the CC, the Assembly of the Department may decide to expel of the student from the program. The expelled student receives a Certificate of Attendance stating all successfully completed modules or other educational activities, along with the received grades and ECTS units.